מַאי טַעְמָא שָׁרוּ לֵיהּ רַבָּנַן לְמִיתַּב כִּיסֵיהּ לְגוֹי? קִים לְהוּ לְרַבָּנַן דְּאֵין אָדָם מַעֲמִיד עַצְמוֹ עַל מָמוֹנוֹ, אִי לָא שָׁרֵית לֵיהּ — אָתֵי לְאֵיתוֹיֵי אַרְבַּע אַמּוֹת בִּרְשׁוּת הָרַבִּים.

GEMARA: We learned in the mishna: One who was traveling on Shabbat eve and night fell, and Shabbat began while he was still en route, gives his money pouch to a gentile. The Gemara asks: What is the reason that the Sages permitted him to give his pouch to a gentile? Is it not prohibited for a Jew to ask a gentile to perform a prohibited labor on Shabbat? The Gemara answers: The Sages maintain that a person does not restrain himself when faced with losing his money. If you do not permit him to give his pouch to a gentile, he will come to carry four cubits in a public domain, thereby violating a Torah prohibition.

for Video Shiur click here to listen:  Psychology of the DAF Shabbos 153

The rabbis acknowledge that at least the typical person may face a nisayon that he or she cannot overcome.

 

There is a saying of dubious origin and provenance, that “Hashem doesn’t give you a nisayon that you cannot overcome”.

This statement is something that every seminary girl, and every yeshiva bochur learns.  But, where is the source for this, and is it even true?

There are at least two Gemaras aside from this one that seem to clearly indicate that there are occasions when, either an individual or a group are not able to overcome a sin.

 

Chagigah 16a

איני והאמר ר' אלעא הזקן אם רואה אדם שיצרו מתגבר עליו ילך למקום שאין מכירין אותו וילבש שחורין ויתעטף שחורין ויעשה מה שלבו חפץ ואל יחלל שם שמים בפרהסיא לא קשיא הא דמצי כייף ליה ליצריה הא דלא מצי כייף ליצריה

The Gemara raises a difficulty: And is that so? But didn’t Rabbi Ela the Elder say: If a person sees that his inclination is overcoming him, he should go to a place where he is unknown, and wear black, and wrap himself in black, in the manner of mourners, because he should be ashamed of his weakness, and do there what his heart desires, but let him not desecrate the Name of Heaven in public. This shows that sinning in private is sometimes preferable to the public performance of a transgression. The Gemara answers: This is not difficult. This case, where one who commits a transgression in public has no concern for the honor of his Maker, occurs when one is capable of overcoming his inclination and fails to do so. That case, where it is preferable to sin in private, occurs when one is incapable of overcoming his inclination. He is therefore advised to, at the very least, refrain from desecrating God’s name in public.

Tosafos ibid

ויעשה מה שלבו חפץ. לגמרי משמע דמוטב לו לאדם שיעשה חפצו בסתר ולא בפרהסיא ולא כפר"ח דשילהי פ"ק דקדושין (דף מ. ושם) דפירש דח"ו שהיה מתיר לעשות עבירה אלא קאמר ילבש שחורים וילך למקום אחר דלבישת שחורים ואכסנאות משברין לבו ולא יבא לידי עבירה ויוכל לעשות מעכשיו מה שלבו חפץ דודאי אין יצרו מתגבר עליו וסוגיא דשמעתא אינו משמע כדבריו הכא ובריש פרק בתרא דמועד קטן (דף יז. ושם):

Mishna Shevi’is 10:3

פְּרוֹזְבּוּל, אֵינוֹ מְשַׁמֵּט. זֶה אֶחָד מִן הַדְּבָרִים שֶׁהִתְקִין הִלֵּל הַזָּקֵן, כְּשֶׁרָאָה שֶׁנִּמְנְעוּ הָעָם מִלְּהַלְווֹת זֶה אֶת זֶה וְעוֹבְרִין עַל מַה שֶּׁכָּתוּב בַּתּוֹרָה (דברים טו) הִשָּׁמֶר לְךָ פֶּן יִהְיֶה דָבָר עִם לְבָבְךָ בְּלִיַּעַל וְגוֹ', הִתְקִין הִלֵּל לַפְּרוֹזְבּוּל:

[A loan secured by] a prozbul is not cancelled. This was one of the things enacted by Hillel the elder; for when he observed people refraining from lending to one another, and thus transgressing what is written in the Torah, “Beware, lest you harbor the base thought, [‘The seventh year, the year of remission, is approaching,’ so that you are mean to your needy kinsman and give him nothing.” Hillel enacted the prozbul.

Maimonides (Guide III:24) cannot accept the notion that G-d would test a human being’s faith in the simple meaning, as G-d needs no proof, and furthermore such a tactic can be perceived as cruel and sadistic.  Maimonides explains:

“The doctrine of trials is open to great objections: it is in fact more exposed to objections than any other thing taught in Scripture...People have generally the notion that trials consist in afflictions and mishaps sent by G-d to man, not as punishments for past sins, but as giving opportunity for great reward...The principle taught in Scripture is exactly the reverse; for it is said: "He is a God of faithfulness, and there is no iniquity in him" (Deut. 32:4)...The teaching of our Sages, although some of them approve this general belief (concerning trials], is on the whole against it. For they say, "There is no death without sin, and no affliction without transgression...The sole object of all the trials mentioned in Scripture is to teach man what he ought to do or believe; so that the event which forms the actual trial is not the end desired: it is but an example for our instruction and guidance."

In essence, Maimonides believes that events may occur, and perhaps even be orchestrated by G-d, that teach others greatness and moral behavior.  In this way, they are a test, that they instruct and exhibit greatness.  However, the actual suffering that the individual experiences must not be gratuitous; it may be a punishment or some other matter that we may not fully understand, but definitely not merely to test a person.  (Maimonides’ view on providence is, as per his practice when discussing secrets of the Torah, veiled in contradiction, hints and obscure passages scattered throughout the Guide.  See Guide Introduction, III:17 and 18, and III:51 for starters.)

It is fascinating that Bereshis Rabbah (55) also responds to the questions of theodicy and even seems to anticipate Maimonides’ questions, as we shall see:

And it came to pass after these things, that God tested [nisah] Avraham (Gen. 21:1). It is written, “You have given a nes (flag, banner) to those who fear You, that it may be displayed [lehithnoses] because of truth [koshet], selah” (Ps. 60:6): this means, trial after trial, greatness after greatness, in order to test them in the world and exalt them in the world like a ship’s flag. And why all this? ‘Because of truth, selah’: so that the attribute of justice [din] may be verified [titkashet] in the world. Thus, if one says: ‘Whom God wishes to enrich, God enriches; to impoverish, God impoverishes; whom God desires God makes into a king; when God wished, God made Avraham wealthy, and when God wished God made him a king!’ Then you can answer that person and say, ‘Can you do what Avraham did?’ And the person would ask: 'What did he do?' and you say: "Avraham was a hundred years old, when his son Itzchak was born to him" (Gen. 21:5); yet after all this pain it was said to him: "Take, please, your son, your only son" (22:2), yet he did not refuse. This is ‘You have given a flag to those who fear You, that it may be displayed’.

The first opinion in the Midrash seems to be saying that it is not a test, but rather a banner or sign to demonstrate why Avraham received such rewards and success.  G-d put Avraham through trials to demonstrate his worthiness to others of the world.

This interpretation solves part of the problem, but it still does not explain fully why G-d could not have somehow proven Avraham’s greatness to the world without causing so much distress and suffering.  Perhaps this is why the Midrash goes on to offer four more interpretations:

“Hashem tries the righteous...Rabbi Yonatan said: When a flax worker knows that his flax is of good quality, the more he beats it the more it improves and the more it glistens; but if it is of inferior quality, he cannot give it one knock without it splitting.”

This interpretation seems to be suggesting that G-d inflicted this test on Avraham to somehow help him improve his character, much as the textile worker beats his flax in order to strengthen it.  This answer provides an explanation for why Abraham had to suffer.  In some way, he needed this experience to grow.  The problem with this interpretation is that it is an ever-so-slight rebuke of Avraham.  Because, this implies that theoretically, Avraham could have been on the level of improving himself without the suffering.  Although we might say, that this is endemic to the human condition, and there exists no human who could completely mentalize all experiences based on good thought alone.  Even the greatest tzaddik might need tribulations to learn some of life’s valuable lessons.

The Midrash then offers another opinion:

“Since a king's word is supreme, who can say to him: ‘What are you doing?’” – R. Avin said: [This may be compared] to a teacher who commands his student, saying to him: (Deuteronomy 16:19) “You shall not judge unfairly,” but [the teacher himself] judges unfairly; (Deuteronomy 16:19) “Do not take a bribe,” but [the teacher himself] takes a bribe; Do not lend on interest, but [the teacher himself] lends on interest. His student said to him: Rabbi, you said to me: Do not lend on interest, but you lend on interest? [Is it] permitted to you but forbidden to me? [The teacher] said to him: I said to you: Do not lend on interest to a Jew, but you may lend on interest to an idol worshipper, as it is written: (Deuteronomy 23:21) “You may lend on interest to a foreigner, but you may not lend on interest to your brother [Israelite].” Thus Israel said before The Holy One Blessed be He: Master of the Universe, you wrote in your Torah: (Leviticus 19:18) “You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge,” but you take vengeance and bear a grudge, as it is said: (Nahum 1:2) “The Lord is vengeful and fierce in wrath. The Lord takes vengeance on His enemies.” The Holy One Blessed be He said to them: I wrote in the Torah: (Leviticus 19:18) “You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against your countrymen,” but I take vengeance against idol worshippers – (Numbers 31:2) “Avenge the Israelite people on the Midianites.” It is written: (Deuteronomy 6:16) “Do not test the Lord” – [but] “God tested Abraham.”

While at first this Midrash appears blasphemous, pointing out what seems to be hypocritical behavior, in actuality the message is deeper and reminiscent of G-d’s message at the end of Job (chapter 38): “Where were you when I laid the earth’s foundations? Speak if you have understanding!”.  This concept is echoed in G-d’s statement to Rabbi Elazar (Taanis 25a): “My son, is it more convenient for you that I return the world to its very beginning? Perhaps you will be born in an hour of sustenance and not be poor!”  The upshot of this particular Midrashic answer is that G-d’s ways are unfathomable and what appears to be unfair is simply part of an intricate web of ways in which G-d must regulate the world for the best.  One cannot pull out one strand without effecting so many others.  We must trust that G-d has His ways, and it is all for the good.

Finally there are two other Midrashic interpretations, which resolve the problem of a test from two sides of the coin, but essentially relying on the same philosophical theme:

“After these things — misgivings were experienced on that occasion. Who then had misgivings? Avraham, saying to himself: ‘I have rejoiced and made all others rejoice, yet I did not set aside a single bullock or ram for the Holy One of Blessing.’ Said the Holy One of Blessing to him: ‘I know that even if you were commanded to offer your only son to Me, you would not refuse.’”

“Itzchak and Ishmael were engaged in a dispute: the latter argued, ‘I am more beloved than you, because I was circumcised at the age of thirteen’; while the other retorted, ‘I am more beloved than you, because I was circumcised at eight days.’ Said Ishmael to him: ‘I am more beloved, because I could have protested, yet I did not.’ At that moment Itzchak exclaimed: ‘O that God would appear to me and bid me cut off one of my limbs! then I would not refuse.’ Said God: ‘Even if I bid you sacrifice yourself, you will not refuse.’” 

These last two interpretations suggest that consciously, or unconsciously, Avraham and/or Yitzchok wished to be tested.  This approach neatly solves Maimonides’ objection to G-d being unjust because the principal participants wished it upon themselves.

To review and conclude, why people are tested can be understand via several approaches.  The most traditional, represented by the plain meaning of many verses as well as Rav Saadiah Gaon, is that G-d tests a person to increase his reward.  There is a potential problem in that approach because it can still be seen as unfair and cruel.  Maimonides answers this by suggesting that G-d does not test the person, so much as allow experiences or even orchestrate experiences so that a person can grow stronger in character.  This approach is supported by several interpretations of Bereishis Rabbah.  The Midrash offers two additional approaches:  One is that we cannot ever hope to understand why G-d does what he does, and we should not question his authority any more than a lowly subject questions a king’s judgement.  Or, perhaps consciously or unconsciously, the person wished to be tested in order to prove his devotion to himself and others. 

for Video Shiur click here to listen:  Psychology of the DAF Shabbos 153

Translations Courtesy of Sefaria

Photo Abba Mari Rav Chaim Feuerman, Ed.D. ZT"L Leiyluy Nishmaso